behaviour

Mind the gap: spatial perseveration by horses, donkeys and mules in a simple detour task

Britta Osthaus
Faith A. Burden
Ian Hocking
Leanne Proops
Presentation date

We compared spatial problem solving abilities in the mule (Equus asinus x Equus caballus) with that of its parent species to assess the effects of hybridization on cognition. In a detour task the animals(N=48) were required to make a detour through a gap at one end of a straight barrier in order to reach a visible target. After one, two, three or four repeats (A trials), the gap was moved to the opposite end of the barrier (B trials) and deviations from the straight line and the latency to crossing the barrier were recorded. Mules performed significantly above chance level on their first detour, unlike the other two species. We discuss our results with reference to hybrid vigour and to the flexibility of problem solving strategies with regards to species differences.

Country
Not published as conference proceedings

A case study to investigate how behaviour in donkeys changes through progression of disease

Gabriela Olmos
Gemma McDonald
Florence Elphick
Neville G. Gregory
Faith A. Burden
Presentation date

Donkeys have a limited repertoire of non-specific signs displayed when in pain or sick. This study looked closely at donkey behaviour during the progression of different diseases with the aim of improving pain and sickness recognition.

Video footage of a group of 79 donkeys at The Donkey Sanctuary was obtained for 6 months; where 45 diseased cases observed. Due data completes, four cases were selected [Cases A) with respiratory disease due to herpes virus (n=2) and Cases B) end-stage cases (hyperlipaemia, n=1; chronic laminitis, n=1)] plus four healthy controls (n=4). Cases A were observed for 8hrs on day -10 and -1 prior to disease onset (day 0 = first veterinary visit) and during treatment (day 1, 5 and 10). Cases B were observed for 8hrs on day -7, -3 and on the day of euthanasia (day 0). Total time (minutes) performing 47 different behaviours were compared between (painful/sick vs. healthy) and within donkeys using chi-square or fisher’s exacts tests.

Diseased donkeys in cases A and B spent on average 10% more time (range, 3 - 17%, p<0.01) with a lowered head carriage compared to controls. Conversely, they spent 15% less time (range 6 - 34%, P<0.04) with their ears in combinations (i.e. each ear in opposite direction), thus meaning ears were more static and unresponsive. Ear changes were subtle but were the earliest indicators of pain/sickness in the observed donkeys. Cases B compared to the controls spent 31% more time in recumbency (range 7 - 60%, p<0.01), and 40% less time eating (range 1 - 64%, p<0.01). The reduction in total eating time was not substituted by any other oral behaviour (e.g. drinking, grooming, licking, and investigative behaviours), where drinking and grooming were greatly affected in the donkey with hyperlipaemia. Finally, abdominal effort was only observed in cases A and tended to reduce with time on treatment (p=0.06).

Donkeys are working animals of great importance worldwide, and these results highlight useful behavioural changes that can be used as monitoring signs of pain/sickness in these animals. The potential use of these signs warrants further studies in greater and more diverse donkey populations.

Colic in the donkey

The donkey is a unique species of equine, with certain specific variations and adaptations that differ from its cousin the horse. The donkey is used by humans as a pack and draft animal in areas of the world where its ability to cope with low‐quality fiber and harsh conditions have excluded the horse. This chapter highlights the differences in anatomy and particularly physiology that have enabled the donkey to fulfill these roles. One of the consequences of being equipped to survive in areas of food scarcity is the tendency to deposit adipose if conditions are reversed. This fact, combined with insulin resistance, leads donkeys rapidly to become metabolically compromised and develop hyperlipemia as a response to stress and sudden reduction in appetite. The consequence is that many donkeys with colic must also be treated for hyperlipemia, which may have a higher mortality rate than the primary condition. Pain behaviors in the donkey may be more subtle than those in the horse and therapeutically there are differences in drug metabolism between donkeys and horses. This chapter summarizes the types of colic that occur in the donkey in relation to anatomic location and as a consequence of management and environmental factors.

Chapter number
38
Start page
471
End page
487

Understanding the socio-economic impact of donkeys

Status
Applicant(s)
Collaborator(s)
Researcher(s)
Start date
End date
Methodology

In depth interviews, participatory rural appraisal (PRA) exercises, case sample evaluations

Aims
  1. Use of in-depth interviews to provide an overview of the different types of social and economic impacts that working donkeys can have in communities.
  2. Development of a series of Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) exercises to investigate and partially quantify the socio-economic impact of working donkeys.
  3. To complete case study evaluations of the socio-economic impact of working donkeys in areas of Ethiopia, to both test and validate the developed approach and to provide new data about the role of working donkeys and mules in the lives of people living in Ethiopia.
  4. To conduct animal-based welfare assessments to complement the socio-economic data gathered in case study areas to investigate relationships between donkey owners' perceptions of the value of their animals and the animal's welfare.
Results

1) Areas of life affected by donkey ownership identified by use of in depth interviews:

  • economic impact
  • provision of care for donkeys
  • empowerment
  • gender
  • social status
  • affect (emotions expressed about owning/working with donkeys)
  • vulnerability & resilience

2) A series of Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) exercises or tools were developed to explore the socioeconomic impact of donkeys.

Nine different tools were developed (including:

Value Web

Dream and Discover

Gender Myths

Empowerment and Status

Matrix of Species

Donkey Expenditure

100 Seeds Seasonal Calendar

Livelihoods Pair-wise Matrix

Who is Your Donkey?

3) Twelve workshops were conducted (two per case study, divided into male and female workshops) in six different communities (three urban and three rural).

a) Donkeys are direct generators of income in the following ways:

  • Pulling carts to transport goods for sale
  • Carrying construction materials in pack saddles
  • Pulling rubbish carts
  • Being rented out to non-donkey owners
  • Occasional use for ploughing and planting agricultural fields
  • Breeding and selling offspring

 

b) Donkeys are also a source of indirect income generation in the following ways:

  • Transporting goods for use (such as firewood) or for bartering
  • Transporting goods to support another form of income (such as feed for cattle or pulling sick animals to a clinic by cart)

c) After meeting their basic needs, people who use donkeys could save money and contribute to community saving organisations (which act as informal banks and insurance programs).

d) Possible non-financial gains from donkey owning include increase in social status, empowerment and sense of pride, contributing to local society, involvement in decision making, and relief from carrying physical burdens and associated health implications.

4) Welfare assessment overview

  • 161 donkeys were sampled (111 stallions and 50 mares)
  • 53% between 5 and 15 years old
  • 64% had an apathetic demeanour
  • 93% had skin lesions (most commonly on hindquarters and tail base)
  • 60% had gait abnormalities
  • 91% had abnormal hoof shapes
  • 64% had signs of limb tethering
  • 54% were thin (body condition score 1.5-2)
  • 51% showed signs of mild to moderate heat stress
  • The majority of working donkeys assessed had two or more welfare issues
Conclusions

The results from the study of the socio-economic impacts of working donkeys in Ethiopia reveal that donkeys are major contributors to people’s lives no matter what context they are living and working in; for their owners, donkeys are the difference between destitution and modest survival. Sadly, the drudgery performed by donkeys is often a reflection of the lives of their owners; their hardships are shared. Donkeys become pathways out of poverty for the poor in rural and urban areas by providing access to opportunities through transportation for income generation, to attend schools, markets, and health clinics. The use of donkeys allows people to earn and save money and increase their ability to contribute to community savings and loans schemes.

Donkey owners expressed acute dependence on their donkeys and articulated feelings of love and friendship, even respect. Donkeys are understood to be animals that make people’s lives easier and act as mutual friends and life supports. Owners describe the importance and value that donkeys bring to their own lives and to their communities, however, although donkeys are undervalued and underappreciated by broader Ethiopian society. Donkeys are seen as ‘low-class’ animals of the working poor and the immense benefits they bring to those who own them remain largely invisible. Furthermore, donkeys’ social position within society is viewed as similar to that of women and, sadly, both are said to be treated equally—being beaten, carrying large loads on their backs and being submissive to men.

Where donkeys are in regular usage they are seen as important animals, friends or even part of the family, and people would find it difficult to make ends meet or provide for their families if they did not own a donkey. Humans rely on donkey transport to health services, to create their livelihoods, to relieve them of physical burdens and prevent them from slipping into extreme poverty. Donkeys rely on humans for feed, veterinary care, shelter, safety, and rest. Thus, donkey and human health are interconnected. However, donkey owners struggle to provide care to their families and livestock; provision of care to donkeys features low down on owners’ priority lists. As a result donkey welfare suffers. Donkey welfare assessment results show that the majority of donkeys surveyed suffered from gait abnormalities, abnormal hoof shapes, a high prevalence of body lesions, poor body condition scores, and displayed behaviours potentially indicative of negative emotional states.

Despite the donkeys important contributions to many of Ethiopia’s poor they remain absent from government animal health and welfare policies, they are overlooked by development goals and are marginalised by wider society. Thus, an exploration of the human dimensions of donkey wellbeing is crucial for understanding and properly valuing the donkeys’ impact in developing countries.

Training compassionate vets for calmer donkeys

Presentation date

Introduction

Working donkeys and mules often require veterinary intervention for a variety of clinical problems. It is crucial that vets, animal health professionals and other equine professionals have a sound knowledge of donkey and mule behaviour to enable them to assess the animals and provide treatment in a species-accurate, humane and compassionate way.

Handling techniques affect equine welfare

The way in which donkeys and mules are handled can affect their welfare since quality of life is measured not only by physiological factors but also by emotional and affective states (1). Negative interactions can contribute to the development of fearful behavioural responses which can persist for a long time after the interaction takes place. Correct application of behaviour modification techniques can positively develop the human-animal bond and help the animal to remain calm during required veterinary procedures, often meaning that painful methods of restraint are not required. Simple techniques for approaching equines, taking rectal temperatures, using stethoscopes and appropriate restraint can, and should, be used to reduce stress for all aspects of a veterinary examination and treatment.

Human body language

Correct approach to an equine patient is vital to minimise stress and to prevent a flight response. Equines are sensitive animals who can detect very subtle body language signals. The body language and behaviour of the veterinary surgeon and animal handler can influence the animal’s behaviour; approach with calm, relaxed body language and allow the animal the opportunity to investigate you.

A relaxed, calm approach:

  • Rounded shoulders
  • Relaxed muscle tone, gentle movements
  • No direct eye contact
  • Indirect approach from the animal’s shoulder
  • Allowing time for the animal to investigate.

Practical application:

  • Using a stethoscope
  • Allow the animal the chance to have a look at your equipment
  • Introduce the stethoscope to the animal’s body gradually, starting in an area that is not too sensitive
  • Stroke or scratch the animal to provide reassurance as you work
  • Taking a rectal temperature
  • Help the animal to relax by approaching steadily from the side
  • Scratch the animal along his body and on either side of his tail to encourage relaxation
  • Do some gentle lifts of the tail before lifting to insert the thermometer.

Less is more

When considering methods of restraint for veterinary examination consider that often ‘less is more’. Distressed and fearful animals are more likely to display erratic behaviours and become more likely to cause injury to themselves or their handlers (2). If calm, consistent handling is not sufficient to keep an equine calm during examination, and restraint is required, the least invasive and minimally aversive restraint options, such as a head hold or the raising of one leg, should be attempted first.

Ear twitches should not be used on equines; a recent study (3) found a significant increase in sympathetic tone and salivary cortisol levels when an ear twitch is applied and it also led to the development of avoidance behaviour indicating the aversive-ness of this procedure. Equines can become sensitised to aversive events or procedures after very few exposures (4) therefore aversive procedures should be avoided wherever possible and stress experienced during veterinary procedures must be kept to an absolute minimum.

Subscribe to behaviour